The consequences of Trump’s administration are cut by NIH and research financing

From the primary week of his administration, President Trump was focused on medical and academic research, limiting the financing of research into universities and reducing the workforce and budget for the National Institutes of Health (Nih). Fears of the longer term of medical research within the United States began on January 22, only three days from the brand new administration, when all meetings to review the applications of subsidies in Nih were canceled No plan to vary the schedule.

Photo © Shutterstock

Within a couple of days, Nih suddenly cut off funds for research projects that included the principles or language related to diversity, equality and inclusion (Dei) in any form, equivalent to clinical trials focused on populations not represented in previous studies. At the start of February, Nih announced Drastic reduction of the speed of indirect costsThe percentage paid to universities for administrative and general costs of financed research. Nih financing of recent subsidies has dropped rapidly; some Analysis in Stat 28% reduction of recent subsidy financing in the primary three months of administration was found. Then in March the colleges were hit, specifically Columbia and Harvard, and the Trump administration threatens the dissolution of all federal funds if universities don’t comply with administration policy demands. Loss of federal funds Suddenly it ended Breakthrough biomedical and behavioral studies in areas from cancer to a chronic disease to infectious diseases, including some longitudinal studies which have been observing participants for years and even a long time.

Damage to the “entire pipeline” of innovation and discoveries.

The impact of the lack of federal funds goes beyond one or two directed universities. Association of Health Care Journalists article He explains: “When the government pulls the plug, it is not only Harvard or Columbia University feels pain – this is the whole pipeline of innovation, discovery and health capital.” Large research projects are run by a network of universities, and in the complete network you’re felt with financing cuts in Columbia and Harvard. The loss extends to the following generation of scientists, because doctoral students and sub -charter scholarship holders lost funds and positions, and Nih has He canceled a ten -year research internship program For students. And although elite institutions are within the news, there are also research at smaller universities that don’t have large Harvard or Colombia equipment.

National Institute of Nursing Research under threat.

Now National Institute of Nursing Research (Ninr) It is on the chopping block. The proposed Trump budget submitted to the Congress at the start can completely eliminate Ninr. IN 40 years Since the founding of the Ninr, the Institute has conducted and financed research that improved patients’ results, advanced health and quality of life, and handled health differences. Since 1997, Ninr has been the primary institute Care research at the tip of life At NIH institutes and other federal agencies. Closing Ninr and limiting funds in the method and future nursing research He could have extensive and harmful effects in all populations, hindering or stopping the further improvement of direct take care of the patient, public health and healthcare services.

IN statement After a budget leakage, DR, president of American Nurseseseseseses, Jennifer Mensik Kennedy, MBA, RN, Nea-BC, Faan, stating:

“Ana definitely believes that Ninr plays a crucial role in ensuring that research conducted by nurses, experience and clinical training still enable our general health care system to enhance and be directed by evidence … Nurses are concerned in regards to the ability to restructure HHS, without Ninr to implement the approach to the nurse who responds to the needs of our care system and require the needs of our care system health.

Many healthcare institutes and centers have an elimination.

Nursing will not be the one NIH institute that will likely be eliminated with the proposed budget. With the declared goal of “Nih reforming and focusing NIH research as the president’s involvement in Mah” (Make America is healthy again), The proposal also eliminates Financing for the National Institute on Minority and Health Disparities, Fogarty International Center and the National Center for Fopimementary and Integrative Health. The proposal states that these changes would adapt the NIH research “with the president’s priorities in order to solve the problem of chronic illness and other epidemic, implementing all executive orders and eliminating research on climate change, radical gender ideology and dividing racosity.”

In general, the budget reduces NIH financing by $ 18 billion, almost 40% of the budget for 2024 in a press release, president and general director of America Mary Woolley called Congress to reject the budget, stating that “[i]It has been made available, the cuts proposed by the president dramatically will slow down American medical research and innovations, taking the health and hope of Americans. Children’s cancer, Alzheimer’s, lupus. . . Name the health threat and this budget would neglect it. “

Healthcare and customarily persons are concerned and express deep concerns in regards to the state of medical research within the United States when the politician and cuts of President Trump come into force. IN questionnaire Published in April within the journal Nature94% of readers replied that they’re nervous in regards to the way forward for science within the United States, and over 90% believed that Trump’s policy would have a negative impact on the US and the world. The authors of the survey note that scientific policy experts warn that “the damage caused by Trump’s administration … may withdraw the United States for decades.”

There will likely be regular AJN updates outside the charts about the small print and consequences of fast and potentially momentous changes introduced by the Trump administration in the general public health system within the United States. Her previous post is “a damage caused by USAID disassembly.”