The Covid pandemic has seen mass exodus health care employees in developed countries, which deepens the present problem staffing crisis within the health service.
In Australia, hospital staff turnover rates reached almost 20% in 2022. Hospital waiting lists in Victoria alone have grown longer in 2023 80 thousand.
The United States and United Kingdom they faced similar staffing problems.
Efforts to accomplish that are underway around the globe educate latest healthcare employees and increase qualified migration of doctors.
However, a very powerful strategy is to keep up the present staff.
The pandemic has accelerated the seek for more flexible types of work, and the concept of a four-day work week continues to realize popularity. Could this be an answer to enhance the retention of burnt-out employees in healthcare?
Burn out
Healthcare employees have experienced this previously high level of burnout.
The strain of balancing a demanding work schedule, including long hours and shift work, with family responsibilities can result in work-family conflict. Additionally, the character of the career signifies that employees are sometimes exposed to traumatic situations akin to patient deaths, further increasing stress levels. COVID has exacerbated the issue burnout in healthcare.
Burnout often leads health care employees to resignand in addition contributes to early retirement.
For those that remain within the career, burnout negatively affects productivityincluding increasing the likelihood of perception medical errors.
Gorodenkoff/Shutterstock
The creation of the four-day week
The four-day working week is predicated on the so-called 100-80-100 system, where 100% of productivity is achieved in 80% of the time with 100% of the remuneration. This may mean working Monday through Thursday, but receiving your full salary and being expected to supply as much in 4 days as you probably did in five.
In a pilot study conducted on the University of Cambridge i 4-day week around the globe, 71% of participants signed up less sense of burnout, and the variety of worker resignations decreased by 57%. These results are just like the outcomes from trials conducted in Belgium, Spain, Japan, Australia and New Zealand.
However, implementing a four-day workweek in healthcare presents unique challenges. The model has been tested primarily in office and company environments, where a five-day workweek is standard, with a complete of 35-40 hours.
For many healthcare employees, especially nurses, longer working hours and shift work are the norm. Nurses are sometimes expected to work on public holidays and could have to work six or seven consecutive days before just a few days off, as an alternative of the usual five days of labor, two days off.
Additionally, many healthcare services, akin to hospitals and aged care homes, require staff seven days per week. It is important that any restructured working arrangements are designed to make sure continuous and adequate staffing.
As a result, a direct transition from a five-day to a four-day working week is probably not immediately logical and inappropriate.
Instead, the model must be understood more broadly in relation to healthcare, specializing in reducing and optimizing working hours and addressing the specifics of industry scheduling and workforce planning.
Application of this model in health care
The focus must be on achieving greater productivity by reducing stress and burnout. While it might not necessarily be practical to maneuver to a four-day workweek, the emphasis must be on shorter working hours, following the 100-80-100 model.
The application of this model in health care will vary. There are, for instance, specialist doctors Average 50 hours per weeksubsequently, using the model would cut back their working week to 40 hours.
In particular the gearshift design for nurses, should concentrate on ways to scale back fatigue and, subsequently, burnout. This may include scheduling shifts at a consistent time of day for individual employees, implementing shorter shifts, and scheduling reasonable consecutive workdays (relatively than seven or more days in a row before receiving a day without work).
Jacob Lund/Shutterstock
Benefits
Reducing hours worked and optimizing shift schedules will help healthcare employees alleviate stress, burnout and work-family conflict. All of it will likely improve staff retention.
Any reduction in staff turnover would save on direct costs related to hiring latest staff. The cost of replacing a highly specialized health care employee may reach as much as PLN 300,000 200% of their annual salary.
Also introducing shorter shifts – for instance shifts lasting 4 or eight hours as an alternative of 12 – can increase absorption shift hours which are often difficult to fill. Measures akin to shorter shifts might also appeal to part-time employees or those that have retired.
Finally, reducing burnout and absenteeism will improve staff productivity. This will not directly reduce costs and profit public health.
Some challenges
Because it might take couple months down Several years To overcome burnout, after implementing any changes, the advantages will only be visible after a while.
Reducing working hours and other schedule changes will initially be difficult given the industry’s current staffing shortages.
We hope that measures akin to migration incentives and subsidized training for medical examiners will strengthen the workforce and help fill this gap.
Although implementation just isn’t easy, changes in work organization within the healthcare sector can have a good greater positive impact than in other industries.
